|
We become angered—we get caught in a traffic jam, a flight we planned is overbooked, a clerk at the other end fouled up our reservations and we must settle for another hotel. When this happens, how many times we have heard it said, or have uttered it ourselves: "I should have been born a hundred years ago!"
Granted, travel a hundred years ago had a romance all of its own. How thrilling for someone living in London to book a cabin (port side going out) on a P&O liner and steam off to the Far East, through the Suez, with a stopover in Bombay, and then on to Singapore, up the Chao Phraya River to Bangkok, across to Saigon and then on to Hong Kong or maybe Manila before reaching Yokohama. A five to six month trip. What excitement!
But we must be realistic. Such travel was not for everyone. Unless they were seamen before the mast, government civil servants, anthropologists working for big museums, or else very very rich people would not have come to Asia merely for a vacation. Nor would they have had the incentive a hundred years ago to travel half way around the world to reach the East. What did they know about Asia? Siam, Singapore or Hong Kong? They were no more than exotic names in fancy gazetteers. There were no guides or travellers' handbooks in those days that sold Asia. In fact, there was very little knowledge about the area in 1904. When Sir Clarke was appointed Governor of the Straits settlement, he requested maps and information of any kind of the Malay Peninsula where he was going and was told there was absolutely no information of any kind available.
And those places that are so popular today—Phuket, Chiang Mai, Bali, Kathmandu—a hundred years ago weren't known, even in Asia. The great ruins of Angkor Wat had only been recently discovered. Kuala Lumpur, the present capital of Malaysia, was little more than a jungle outpost, less than 40 years old. Taiwan was a coaling station in the South China Sea, and Phuket, visited by Captain Light a century before, was only a mark on sailing charts. Pattaya was a fishing village.
Nevertheless, visitors did come east. We have the accounts of many of these early travellers. Joseph Conrad wrote volumes about Asia, Anna Leonowens told us in her book about her life in the Royal court in Bangkok, Alfred Wallace explored the eastern jungles and reported on them, and many lesser-known travellers, like Isabella Bird, an English woman who passed through Southeast Asia, have handed down their stories which fortunately are in print today. Many of these travellers’ tales are fascinating and informative, and they give us a clear picture of what travelling in this part of the world was like in their day. And from what they had to tell, it wasn't all that romantic, not as we imagine it to have been. And there was no Royal Orchid Holidays.
So let's suppose, for one reason or another, perhaps a rich uncle died or a museum agreed to back you, you did decide to come to Siam. How would you get here, and once you did come, where would you stay? Hotels were few. What about the sights, what could you see and do, and how would you get around? There were no buses, taxis or trains. There weren't even roads. What, then, was it like travelling in Asia back then?
To have reached Asia, of course you would have had to come by sea. Travel by land then was impossible. (It took Marco Polo 17 years to make the round trip.) There were, however, some fine shipping lines then, the P&O Line and the Messangeries Maritimes, but the bulk of the travellers came by steerage class on merchant vessels. It was a tough way to travel, far below deck in airless cabins jammed with bunks.
Furthermore, first class or steerage, you could expect the voyage to last six weeks from London, five weeks from San Francisco. The big boon to travel to Asia came in 1869 with the opening of the Suez Canal. Travel time was cut in half.
What we also tend to forget today is that those travellers who did manage to reach Asia back then made it a-once-in-a-lifetime trip. There were no repeated journeys. There simply wasn't enough time when travel was so slow. I often think about this when I meet someone today, and they announce in one breath how nice it would have been to visit Asia a hundred years ago, and in the next breath they say that on their vacation next year they might take in Phuket instead of Pattaya. Visits to Asia today can be yearly events; they weren't in 1904.
|

Before airports and air
travel the post docks
were the centre of
excitement

Travel advertisements
100 years ago came in
journal and magazines

A major means of travel
within a city was by
rickshaw

Hard to believe, but this
was Kuala Lumpur, the
capital of Malaysia
a little over
a hundred years ago

Singapore developed
rapidly as a Straits
Settlement

Few hotels a hundred
years ago, but colonial
homes were abundant

Early train travel was
not the best, but better
than elephant back

Wild elephants were the
train engineers traffic
problem

Southeast East Asia
changed when the
demand for
rubber grew. Here is one
of the first rubber trees

The first motor carriage
is about to put the
rickshaw out of business

Little traffic problems
in 1904

The first Thai Airways
plane makes an
appearance and the
world was never the same
|